为什么CNN要剪图？
这不是小事，专业做新闻的一定会很注意的。

你给的一个链接我看了，那篇文中说原始照片被AFP切成了几张不同的图，但是BBC/CNN/FT都只用了这张图。如此看来，他们都很专业。

看了CNN页面，图片是不是已经改了？

Lalala:

Thank you so much. This link is enough to prove that CNN changed its reports later after they could not conceal the fact any more.

不知道是我没有看懂还是你没有看懂，我怎么觉得Lalala给的链接并不是站在你那一边呢？

Thank you so much. This link is enough to prove that CNN changed its reports later after they could not conceal the fact any more.

And FQX , Is this enough to prove that CNN is biased on this topic? While, you can still insist that this is a PSed web page. However, you can insist as yo want, but people can use their own intelligence to tell what is right or wrong.

究竟是谁别有用心?

Then tell me , 究竟是谁别有用心? Me? CNN? or You?

如我所说的，由于证据不充足，所有怀疑都只是主观猜测。

However, We all can see, it was modified. That;s why the updating timestamps shows a much later one.

CNN can erase any trace can lead to its bias report. Unless CNN keep the original archive, viewers would never be able to provide proof. Because the suspect this time,is also the police and the judge. Right?

If CNN is really neutral like you claimed, why it did not show the pictures of Han and other innocent people beaten, knock down, or even killed? Why did it always telling the story from Dalai group? Why didn’t it report any interview that telling the truth, especially from those western tourists?Can you explain these? If this is not biased or deliberately misleading(cheating if go straightforward), than what is biased? Then tell me , 究竟是谁别有用心? Me? CNN? or You?

I don’t know if you want to prove that the US medias are unbiased, but here are some links can tell you something.

这位同学，你说我链接错了，于是我等你的原文链接，但是你拿出的链接全部是其他站点的。
修改文章不过是一个阴谋论的猜测，没有修改前的版本，我们无法认定它的变化和动机。
我的意思很明白：目前有一部分猜测完全基于主观恶意，我认为这样不好，所以反对一下。
至于你说到评论之后会有验证的问题，这是防止spam的措施，并不是对你才特别对待。如果你觉得我有意阻拦你的评论，那可真是无话可说了。

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/mar/15/tibet.china2
shttp://att.newsmth.net/att.php?p.800.435422.288.ppt
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GEW2tXV4Vw

However, the article was posted originally at March,15th. Can you smell something odd? It is not likely a article to be modified, especially two days later.

However, the article was posted originally at March,15th. Can you smell something odd? It is not likely a article to be modified, especially two days later.

If you want to prove that the US medias are unbiased, here are some links can tell you something.

http://www.guar dian.co.uk/world/2008/mar/15/tibet.china2
shttp://att.new smth.net/att.php?p.800.435422.288.ppt
http://www.you tube.com/watch?v=9GEW2tXV4Vw